Validation science, published.
We open-source what makes our claims checkable: weights, benchmarks, harnesses, raw predictions. The training engineering stays private. Reproducible in use; honest about what that means.
One model, one benchmark, one harness to check both.
The weights, the evaluation data, and the code that scores them, published so every CORE-68 number behind HivemindEval can be checked independently, not taken on faith.
Model
huggingface.co/Hypereum/HivemindEval
Apache-2.0 · full merged model in bfloat16 safetensors · full model card
View model cardBenchmark
huggingface.co/datasets/Hypereum/hivemind-eval-benchmark
68-item stratified subset · per-item gold · every model's raw predictions
View dataset cardHarness
github.com/hypereum-innovations/hivemind-eval
stdlib inference + scoring · methodology doc
View repositoryRadical transparency includes our mistakes.
v2.0 was publicly visible on the Hub for a period beginning May 2026 and was later withdrawn; this release (v2.1) supersedes it.
An earlier version (v2.0) suffered complete rating collapse: it emitted the identical overall_score of 75, and an identical per-dimension score vector, for every input, regardless of quality (std 0.0 across a graded probe set), while producing perfectly well-formed JSON. It was syntactically valid and semantically inert.
The defect was caught in our internal validation program and root-caused to defective training labels (the labels carried a constant score vector rather than real judgments; no model trained on them could learn to discriminate). v2.1 is a full retrain on corrected labels and passes the anti-collapse acceptance gate; the benchmark items used to evaluate it are hash-proven disjoint from its training data.
Format validity is not judgment quality.
We publish our failures next to our results. That is what verifiable means.
Reproduce it.
$ python3 eval/score_benchmark.py --gold data/gold_subset.json --predictions-dir data/predictions
⟩ every CORE-68 cell of the published board, bit-for-bit, bootstrap CIs included, seed 7, no GPU required
Prefer to regenerate predictions from the weights? One 24 GB GPU and the card's quickstart, verbatim.
What we don't publish, and why.
What's public is the validation science: how the benchmark is built, the gates a model has to clear, and the methodology behind every score. What stays private is the model's training pipeline: data generation, labeling, and hyperparameters. Open where it builds trust; private where it is the product.
We're recruiting the panel that will grade us.
Every number we publish is provisional until independently validated. We are recruiting UK/EU compliance experts for a ≥3-reviewer blind validation panel: blind to model identity and to each other, per-dimension anchored rubrics, abstention allowed. Panel results set the human ceiling and convert provisional numbers into validated ones, whatever they show.
Join the panelLicense & citation.
License
Apache-2.0. Fine-tuned from Qwen/Qwen3-8B (Apache-2.0, © Alibaba Cloud); thanks to the Qwen team for the base model.
Citation
@software{hivemindeval2026,
author = {Hypereum},
title = {HivemindEval: an open-weight verifier for UK/EU compliance analysis},
year = {2026},
url = {https://huggingface.co/Hypereum/HivemindEval},
note = {Provisional benchmark results pending independent expert validation}
}